Peer Review Process

Understanding our rigorous peer review standards and procedures

Our Peer Review Process

1. Initial Editorial Review

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial review within 2-3 weeks of submission. During this stage, our editorial team evaluates:

  • Manuscript scope and relevance to journal focus
  • Technical quality and methodological soundness
  • Originality and significance of contribution
  • Compliance with submission guidelines
  • Ethical considerations and research integrity
Note: Manuscripts that do not meet our basic criteria may be rejected at this stage without external review.

2. Reviewer Selection

For manuscripts that pass initial review, we employ a double-blind peer review process:

  • Minimum of 2-3 independent reviewers per manuscript
  • Reviewers selected based on expertise and research area
  • International panel of distinguished scholars
  • Strict conflict of interest screening
  • Anonymous review process protecting both authors and reviewers

3. Review Timeline

Standard Review

6-8 weeks

Complete peer review process

Expedited Review

4-5 weeks

For time-sensitive research

4. Review Criteria

Our reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on the following criteria:

25%
Originality

Novel contribution and innovation

25%
Methodology

Research design and analysis

20%
Significance

Impact and implications

15%
Clarity

Writing and presentation

10%
Literature

Comprehensive coverage

5%
Ethics

Research integrity

5. Decision Categories

Accept
~15%

Manuscript accepted with minor editorial changes only

Minor Revision
~35%

Requires minor changes, typically 2-4 weeks for revision

Major Revision
~30%

Substantial revisions required, 4-8 weeks for revision

Reject
~20%

Manuscript does not meet publication standards

6. Revision Process

For manuscripts requiring revision:

  • Authors receive detailed reviewer comments and editorial feedback
  • Point-by-point response to reviewer comments required
  • Revised manuscript undergoes additional review if needed
  • Final editorial decision typically within 2-3 weeks of resubmission

Quality Assurance

Our peer review process maintains the highest standards of academic integrity. All reviewers are bound by confidentiality agreements and ethical guidelines. For questions about the review process, contact our editorial office at info@iaoalliance.org.