China-U. S Common Goals: The Need to Cooperate on Global Governance

David Bashiel Kolleh ¹

¹ Liberia Academy of Sciences (LAS), Monrovia, Liberia

dkolleh25@gmail.com

https://doi.org/10.64574/ghss.2025.1.2.5

Open Access

Under a Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0

This article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). You are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the CC BY 4.0 license, and indicate if changes were made.

Published: 24 Dec 2025

Abstract

The relationship between the United States and China is significantly strained. Both countries are involved in a fierce and costly economic confrontation (trade war), competition in artificial intelligence (AI race), global governance, and security tensions. These issues threaten the current international order, and resolving them through negotiations may not guarantee long-term stability when the underlying factors that fuelled the conflict are not addressed. Fundamental ideas that once guided their relationship, such as engagement, cooperation, and convergence, are now being questioned. Additionally, the institutional framework for dialogue is being tested, as established communication channels have weakened, and bureaucratic processes on both sides struggle to keep up with increasing global complexity and diversity.

Keywords

Global Governance;United States-China;Cooperation;Competition

Conclusion

The trajectory of global governance in the twentyfirst century will be decisively shaped by the capacity of China and the United States to cooperate on issues of shared concern. As the largest developed and developing countries, their relationship is not merely bilateral but foundational to the stability of the international system. Past collaboration between these two powers has underpinned unprecedented levels of peace, prosperity, and interdependence, yet the durability of these achievements is increasingly threatened by rising tensions, institutional strains, and divergent strategic objectives.

References

［1］ China Daily. (2021, January 26). China, US must work for global common good. China Daily. https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202101/26/ WS600f503ea31024ad0baa4fa2_1.html

［2］ Zhao, Z. (2025, December 19). China's military build-up could ‘seriously' affect Japan's security, Tokyo warns. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/ diplomacy/article/3337079/chinas-military-buildcould-seriously-affect-japans-security-tokyowarns

［3］ Fingar, T. (2015, April 20). The United States and China: Same bed, different dreams, shared destiny. Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University. https://aparc.fsi.stanford.edu/publication/ united-states-and-china-same-bed-differentdreams-shared-destiny

［4］ Wang, Y. (2018). Trade trap: China and the US must avoid a "new Cold War." Global Asia, 12(2). https://www.globalasia.org/v12no2/cover/tradetrap-china-and-the-us-must-avoid-a-new-coldwar_wang-yong

［5］ Atlantic Council. (2013, September 17). ChinaUS cooperation: Key to the global future. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil. org/in-depth-research-reports/report/china-uscooperation-key-to-the-global-future/

［6］ M e d e i r o s , E . S . ( 2 0 1 9 ). T h e c h a n g i n g fundamentals of US-China relations. The Washington Quarterly, 42(3), 93–119. https://doi. org/10.1080/0163660X.2019.1666355

［7］ CGTN. (2017, August 1). China opens first overseas military base in Djibouti. CGTN. https:// www.cgtn.com

［8］ Leake, G. A. (2020). China's engagement in the promotion of peace and security in the Horn of Africa: An interplay of big power responsibility and geopolitical interest. African Journal of Political Science and International36 Global Humanities and Social Sciences Volume 1, Issue 2, September, 2025 Relations, 14(4), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.5897/ AJPSIR2019.1173

［9］ Priavo Security. (2023, February 3). Maritime incident report: January 2023. Priavo Security. https://priavosecurity.com/maritime-incidentreport-january-2023/

［10］ Blair, R. A., Di Salvatore, J., & Smidt, H. M. (2023). UN peacekeeping and democratization in conflict-affected countries. American Political Science Review, 117(4), 1308–1326. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0003055422001319

［11］ Clarke, C., & Kan, P. (2017). Uighur foreign fighters: An underexamined jihadist challenge. Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Studies, 8(5). Retrieved at: Uighur Foreign Fighters: An Underexamined Jihadist Challenge | International Centre for Counter-Terrorism - ICCT

［12］ Gebhard, C., & Smith, S. J. (2015). The two faces of EU-NATO cooperation: Counter-piracy operations off the Somali coast. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(1), 107–127. https://doi. org/10.1177/0010836714532917

［13］ Gowan, R. (2010). China's pragmatic approach to UN peacekeeping. Brookings Institution. https:// www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-pragmaticapproach-to-un-peacekeeping

［14］ Maysun, J. A. (2023). Are religious beliefs truly the root cause of terrorism? Journal of Global Faultlines, 10(2), 252–263. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/48750207

［15］ Mishra, M., & Mishra, V. K. (2021). China's Belt and Road Initiatives: Examining debt trap diplomacy for regional supremacy in the context of Sri Lanka. World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues, 25(1), 122–135. https://www. jstor.org/stable/48622938

［16］ Patrick, S. (2023). UN Security Council reform: What the world thinks. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment. org/research/2023/06/un-security-councilreform-what-the-world-thinks

Volume 1 Issue 2

Publication Date: Dec 2025

Global Humanities and Social Sciences

ISSN (Print): 3105-174X

ISSN (Online): 3105-1758

Language: English

Frequency: Quarterly

Founded: 2025